Understanding physician leadership in Canada: overview of a CSPE/CMA/CHI study

Johny Van Aerde, MD

 

ARTICLE

Back to Index

Physician leadership is necessary for the transformation of the Canadian health care system because physicians have a unique knowledge of that system. However, many physicians are not compensated for their leadership roles, receive little support in terms of training or resources, and may be viewed with suspicion by colleagues.

 

The rapidly changing environment of the health system requires physicians to become engaged as leaders.1,2 Physician leaders can play a significant role in innovation and transformation within the health care system.3-5 Physicians can truly influence the value equation: value equals quality divided by cost.6 However, to optimize participation of physicians as leaders in the health care system, one needs to understand the factors that may help support those who wish to take a more active role in health care reform.7 Given that their training focuses on clinical preparation, many physicians lack effective leadership skills; however, they must not only know what is needed to work in the system, they must also learn what is required to work on the system.8 Top

 

To determine the demographics of Canadian physician leaders and to better understand the needs of physicians who take on leadership roles, the Canadian Society of Physician Executives (CSPE), in partnership with the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) and the Centre for Healthcare Innovation (CHI) at the University of Manitoba, conducted a study on physician leadership with the following objectives:

 

  • To develop a baseline of demographic data on formal and informal leadership roles of physicians in Canada
  • To understand the factors that enable and deter physicians from taking on leadership roles
  • To gauge the current level of satisfaction and dissatisfaction of physicians with their leadership positions
  • To determine ways for organizations to increase physician engagement in leadership

 

Data were gathered using a large electronic survey (689 responses for a 17% response rate) and semi-structured interviews (15). Some highlights of the results follow. Top

 

Profile of the physician leader

Physician leaders tend to work well beyond what is strictly required in their formal roles. In more than 50% of cases, they work in a wide variety of settings by taking on several formal and informal leadership roles simultaneously. Among survey respondents, 1 in 14 of those in formal leadership roles are not paid and 18% receive a stipend only. In general, rural physicians work more unpaid hours in leadership roles than urban physicians.

 

On average, respondents spend 38–81 hours a month on voluntary activities, for which half receive no support while the other half receive recognition, support for education, or office/administrative support. It was noted that two thirds of all leadership learning is acquired through the CMA’s Physician Leadership Institute (PMI) courses and the annual Canadian Conference on Physician Leadership cohosted by the CSPE and CMA. Most of the remaining third is acquired from courses offered by their organization or from advanced courses and degrees pursued by individual physicians on their own initiative. Top

 

Perspectives on physicians’ current leadership roles

Physician leadership is thought to be necessary for the transformation of the Canadian health care system because physicians have a unique knowledge of that system. Physician leaders find it satisfying to make a difference and to influence change by enabling others and working as a team. This aligns with the hallmarks identified for effective physician leaders, including the courage to maintain strong values, such as servant-leadership, integrity, walking the talk even in the face of adversity, and working collaboratively with others toward a shared vision.

 

Although respondents reported that leading other physicians is both satisfying and dissatisfying depending on the circumstances, overall, they described it as “herding cats.” Dissatisfaction with their current role comes from dealing with bureaucracy, which is often perceived as ineffective and impeding change. Work was portrayed as increasingly complex: long and sometimes unpaid hours without recognition, and a struggle to maintain work–life balance. Top

 

Challenges and opportunities to engage physicians as leaders in health organizations

The biggest challenges for physicians taking on medical leadership roles are the demands on personal time and the impact on their financial welfare. Structural issues include the ongoing and peripatetic regionalization of local and regional health care organizations and irregular and inconsistent characterizations of the formal physician leadership role.

 

Culturally, there is still a negative attitude emanating from practising physicians, who often view physicians who take on leadership roles as having “gone to the dark side.” According to survey respondents, the negative attitude toward medical leaders is present throughout the entire medical system — from medical school through residency to clinical practice — and it is a limiting factor for physicians who want to develop leadership skills and take on leadership roles. Top

 

The lack of training in leadership skills was identified as a strong barrier to physician leadership. Respondents recommended the introduction of such learning at all stages of a physician’s career and throughout the entire health system. Organizations were encouraged to optimize the chance to engage physicians in leadership roles by implementing succession planning and talent management and by providing financial remuneration or other rewards and recognition.

 

In addition to appropriate leadership training, respondents suggested that physicians would also benefit from coaching and from promotion based on performance improvement and related accountability. Standardized evaluation and accreditation, such as the Canadian Certified Physician Executive (CCPE) credential, was noted as a method to improve the credibility of physician leaders among their peers and among administrators. Although maintaining a clinical practice appears to be important for credibility among peers, it seems less important for physician leaders with longer clinical experience or for those who need to spend more time on increasingly demanding senior leadership activities.

 

Conclusions

The findings of this study imply that health system transformation toward improved patient care requires physicians to engage in life-long leadership development, for which the system will have to find resources. The identified need for learning and for attitudinal changes toward physicians who want to engage in leadership activities constitute a large void that can be filled by the combined efforts of the CSPE and CMA’s Physician Leadership Institute. The question is whether the health care system and the organizations within it are willing to make the structural and cultural changes required to make this happen and to free up the necessary time and finances. Top

 

References

1.Angood P. Unique benefits of physician leadership — an American perspective. Leadership Health Serv 2014;27:272-82.

2.Kaplan AS, Porter E, Klobnak L. Creating a strategy-based physician leadership development program. Physician Exec 2012;38:22-5.

3.Baker R, Denis JL. Medical leadership in health care systems: from professional authority to organizational leadership. Public Money Manage 2011;31:355-62.

4.Spurgeon P, Mazelan PM, Barwell F. Medical engagement: a crucial underpinning to organizational performance. Health Serv Manage Res 2011;24:114-20.

5.Weiss R. The quest for physician engagement. Physician relationships are crucial in today’s changing environment. Marketing Healthc Serv 2011;Spring:29-31.

6.Schwartz RW, Souba WW. Equipping physicians to lead: principles for innovation. Am J Surg 2000;180:185-6.

7.Dickson G. Anchoring physician engagement in vision and values: principles and framework. Regina: Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region; 2012. Available: http://www.rqhealth.ca/inside/publications/physician/pdf_files/anchoring.pdf

8.Reinertsen LL. Physicians as leaders in the improvement of health care systems. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:833-8. Top

 

The Understanding Physician Leadership in Canada research study was conducted by Anita Snell, PhD, and directed by Graham Dickson, PhD, senior research advisor to the CSPE. The coordinating committee comprised:

• Dr. Terry Klassen, Frank Krupka,  Dr. Debrah Wirtzfeld, Centre

 for Healthcare Innovation

 (University of Manitoba

 and Winnipeg Regional Health    Authority)

• Emily Gruenwoldt-Carkner,    Canadian Medical Association

• Drs. Gillian Kernaghan, Rowland   Nichol, Brendan Carr, and Johny Van Aerde, Canadian Society of   Physician Executives

 

Author

Johny Van Aerde is past president of the Canadian Society of Physician Executives. He is clinical professor of pediatrics at the University of British Columbia and the University of Alberta and an associate faculty member at the School for Leadership Studies at Royal Roads University in Victoria. He is also on the faculty of the Physician Leadership Institute.

 

Correspondence to:

johny.vanaerde@gmail.com

 

 

This article has been reviewed by a panel of physician leaders.

Top